28 Years Later Reviews: Critics Consensus & Box Office (2025)

Horror fans had waited more than two decades for Danny Boyle to return to the rage-virus universe, and when 28 Years Later finally reached theaters on June 20, 2025, it arrived carrying a fresh-but-not-unanimous Rotten Tomatoes score of 67% at the time of Collider’s box-office report, while also passing $125 million at the global box office. That combination of “fresh” critical coverage and real commercial momentum is why the film is now being discussed as a hit rather than a flop.

The following table summarizes the film’s key details from multiple sources.

Rotten Tomatoes score: 67% · Global gross: $125M+ · Franchise standing: No. 1 worldwide

What the Rotten Tomatoes score actually says

A Rotten Tomatoes score is not a grade out of 100. It is the percentage of counted reviews that are positive. A 67% score means 28 Years Later was “Fresh” with critics, but far from a consensus knockout.

Collider’s box-office report noted the 67% score while also reporting the film’s $125M global gross. In other words, the movie was doing what legacy sequels usually need to do: bringing in festival-level critical goodwill while translating it into commercial heat.

Here is how the numbers compare across the three most useful measurements:

The implication: critics gave the film a pass, but audiences might have felt differently—a pattern common in legacy sequels.

Was 28 Years Later a hit or a flop?

For a horror sequel made with a reported franchise budget, the evidence points toward “hit.” The film had already generated $125M at the worldwide box office, according to Collider, and that sum put it inside the global top 100 of the year. That alone made it the highest-grossing film in the franchise, according to Wikipedia’s summary.

It was also a title that stayed in cultural conversation long after its opening weekend. Yahoo Entertainment’s streaming report pointed to the same 67% Rotten Tomatoes score while noting the film’s availability on digital platforms. Sequels that quietly fall over at the box office do not usually earn that kind of fast-following release.

The catch: initial buzz often fades, but here the box office and critical score both held up.

Why did 28 Years Later receive mixed reviews?

The film’s tonal shifts—from folk horror to zombie action to satire—divided critics. Some praised its emotional depth, while others found it tonally uncertain, as noted by The Guardian and Reddit discussions.

Why is Jimmy Savile in 28 Years Later?

Jimmy Savile appears in a flashback sequence in the film, a decision that has sparked controversy due to his history of sexual abuse. Director Danny Boyle has not officially commented on the cameo.

How 28 Years Later fits into the franchise

The story begun with 28 Days Later in 2002 and continued with 28 Weeks Later, according to the franchise history sketched by Collider. 28 Years Later arrives as the third chapter, and a fourth film has already been greenlit.

Franchise timeline

• 2002: 28 Days Later starts the series
• 2006: 28 Weeks Later continues it
• June 2025: 28 Years Later opens, per Rotten Tomatoes first-reviews coverage
• Next: 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

What this means: the series has momentum, but the next installment will face higher expectations.

Is 28 Years Later scary?

Early reviews indicate the film balances visceral horror with satirical elements, making it more unsettling than purely jump-scare driven. Audiences on Reddit described it as “deeply weird and unsettling.”

What’s confirmed — and what’s not

Confirmed facts

• The film opened on June 20, 2025, according to Rotten Tomatoes.
• Critics had it at 67% Fresh at the time of Collider and Yahoo Entertainment’s coverage.
• It passed $125M globally, per Collider.
• It is the highest-grossing movie in the franchise, per the film’s Wikipedia summary.

Still unclear

• The exact final Rotten Tomatoes score after all reviews are counted.
• How much of the $125M was front-loaded into opening-weekend business rather than being spread across the full run.
• What The Bone Temple will do with the story after this film’s ending.
• Whether the film will maintain its franchise box office lead after its full theatrical run.

The pattern: the confirmed facts give a clear snapshot, but the unclear items highlight the volatility of early box office data.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Neither the Rotten Tomatoes score nor the box-office number measures atmosphere, momentum, or the joy of seeing Danny Boyle back in a horror sandbox. But the numbers do provide a snapshot of a film that was solid enough with critics to be called “Fresh” and commercial enough to reset the financial ceiling of the series.

The next big question is whether 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple performs as well once audiences do not have “first sequel in 17 years” as a selling point.

28 Years Later has crossed $125M at the global box office, making it a breakout for the franchise.

Collider

The film became the highest-grossing entry in the 28 Days Later series.

Wikipedia

Bottom line: 28 Years Later looks even more like a success once you separate the two stories audiences were asked to follow: a Fresh critical score that did not promise a masterpiece, and a box-office result that made it the defining financial title of the franchise so far.

Frequently asked questions

Related reading

• Top 100 Movies of All Time: The Ultimate List (2025)
• Cillian Murphy Peaky Blinders: Role, Casting & Film